Video Content
This box contains video content. In order to view the video you require Flash Player Version 9 or above.
Download Flash Player here
Andy Richards reports on what may be an alternative to incineration, recycling
A row's brewing in Guernsey over whether there should be another States incinerator debate.
Just when you thought protesters had done enough to stop Guernsey building an incinerator, the States decide to bring the issue back to the assembly one more time.
Deputy Tony Spruce will table a requete at this month's States meeting on the 24th calling for the island to re-install Suez's proposed £93 million incinerator.
Posted By: Peter, St Martins on 10-Mar-2010
If this requette wins will another deputy bring an opposing requette? Maybe we should go best of five votes. It seems that`s the way our States is run these days. The decision was made BEHIND CLOSED DOORS (what was there to hide from the public) for the members involved directly to abstain from the vote on the Suez contract. I think I`m right in saying that that decision was taken by a vote of all the States Members or with their acceptance of advice from the legal advisors to The States. If that`s the case then what is Deputy Spruce complaining about? It stinks of underhand dealings.
If you refuse to print this article, as you did with my first article, will you please have the descency to send me an e mail to explain why?
Posted By: Mr Bourgaize on 10-Mar-2010
How long has the current tip got?
How long has Ronez got left of Stone?
What is Jerseys Costs?
What is the price of pay as you throw?
What exactley will Rodney Brouard do we need to see it?
Why waste 93m on Suez when we need better Education Buildings, Sea wall could be improved, Car parking in town and the funds are low as it is?
Finaly do the public have a say or do they just keep going till they get what they want?
.gif)
.jpg)
10/03/2010
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Twitter
Comment on this article